Jaeyoun Kim’s ESSAY ABOUT THE PHILIPPINES 

">

Jaeyoun Kim is a South Korean who wrote this essay  when he was a student at the University of the Philippines sometime in 2006.  In it he claims that the Filipinos' problem is not corruption but the lack of love for our country.

There is some truth to Jaeyoun Kim’s claims and observations about our country, however, to say that “... the problem is the lack of love for the Philippines” is a very simplistic way of looking at and solving the country’s myriad of problems.
 
Response to the Essay:
It was true that in the fifties up to the early sixties, before Ferdinand Marcos plundered our country’s treasury, we were considered rich by Asian standard.  But even then, during the Garcia and the Macapagal presidency, corruption was in the ascendancy.  I can still hear my father saying that Marcos is the solution to the country’s graft and corruption malady.  Even he realised how wrong he was!

Decades on, corruption still exists but in a more sophisticated, deeply rooted and centralised form.  It has spread extensively in all walks of life that corruption seems to be the norm and a part of the Filipino culture.  How could we have allowed this to happen?   Could it be true that we have not loved our country enough?  And is it also true that ‘all we need is love’?

How can you say that the Filipinos do not love their country?  You are talking about the people who brought `PEOPLE POWER’ to the world.  We were the people who put our lives at stake by lining up the streets and in front of the Dictator Marcos’ tanks and armaments.  We won the People Power Revolution without a shot being fired!

We are also the people, who through People Power Revolution, brought about the first Impeachment Trial in Southeast Asia.  It led to the downfall of the then President, Ejercito Estrada.

Of course we love our country, but successive exercise of People Power Revolution did not bring change to our political landscape.  Corruption got worse even with succeeding presidents vowing to curb graft and corruption.  Even though Cory Aquino was able to restore democracy in the Philippines, the 1987 Constitution that she inspired, was toothless.  It kept the power in the society in the hands of the politicians and the rich and powerful.  The poor became poorer and the rich, richer.  The old pre-Marcos system was kept intact.

The sad and obvious result was people’s disappointment and apathy.  As corruption deepens in the three branches of government, people had become numbed to it.  It became part of their lives.  Sadly, it became part of our culture!  Law became selective in favour of the rich and powerful.  Many judges were bribed, bought or coerced.  Laws were reformed, revised and amended, again by the powerful few.  So where do the ordinary people fit into it?  Besides being the recipient of a defective law, NOWHERE.

Of course we love our country and still do.  We have not deserted it but we have learned to accept our misfortune.  We have become tired of and disillusioned by People Power Revolution.  So, is all we need _LOVE?

The only solution to our society’s problem besides love is the shifting of real power in government from the privileged few to the people.  How do we do this?  Since our one judge system is flawed and is prone to corruption, we should change it to a jury system where juries of ordinary citizens have the final say in civil and criminal cases.  As Winston Churchill once said “ONLY AS LONG AS JURIES OF ORDINARY CITIZENS HAVE THE FINAL SAY, GOVERNMENT REMAINS THE SERVANT, NOT THE MASTER OF THE PEOPLE.”

As historian De Tocqueville in his book “Democracy in America” said _ THE JURY SYSTEM IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY OF ESTABLISHING THE PEOPLE’S RULE AND THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY OF TEACHING THEM HOW TO RULE.

However, there are many Filipinos who will not advocate the jury system simply because the idea came from the west.  After years of being free from the Americans, they still retain their suspicion of the `colonial mentality’.   A typical example of this type of Filipino is Francis Rae Camtugan who wrote in the Philippine Jury System’s (an affiliate of Philippine Jury Campaign Int’l (UK) Ltd.) Facebook that:_ “There is no need to copy the American Jury System or any foreign jury system. The jury system was created and perfected in the West. It fits the culture and societal structures of some Caucasian groups. Getting a foreign judicial system and introducing it to the Philippines is like getting a temperate-region plant and trying to cultivate it in a tropical climate. The different ethnic groups can create their own or modify the currently existing systems as to conform to traditions.

So what's next? - Pattern ASEAN with the Socialist European Union, elect a minority President, get rid of the peso and devise a new currency for the Southeast Asian nations or more free trade? I understand that the idea of having a jury system is merely an offshoot of some people’s inclination towards more Western values and internationalism.”

As a people, we do not have to re-invent the wheel to find a system that will work for us.  Many inventions in the field of science and sociology came from the west, even the World Wide Web.  They are generally good, so why abhor them just because they are western?  Grow up, Francis.

Francis’ diatribe was followed by April’s retort, “Although I do agree about "NOT" copying the American Jury System. I agree Not because it is American but because our people is not yet politically mature as a whole to handle such a system.”

The Filipinos will not reach political maturity if they do not have the means and exposure to situations that will lead to political maturity.  By analogy, birds do not learn to fly by jumping up and down in their nests.  They have to fall and as they fall, they must learn to fly.  Does this address your doubt, April?

This is how the Filipinos will reach maturity and on the way, they will learn their duties and responsibilities as citizens; be able to judge their own peers and learn to rule and be ruled.  Our country’s leaders will be deterred from corruption because they know that the people can sue government officials for irregularities and mismanagement.  Corrupt leaders will not be shielded by their money and power.   THE PEOPLE RULES.

Finally, when the people has the sovereign power and sit next to each other whatever religion or social status as jurors, they become equal in the eyes of God and Man.  The enmity between the Christians and Muslim brothers will be quelled.  There will be reconciliation and thus we will all live in peace.

So, to sum up this response to Jaeyoun Kim’s essay about the Philippines _ YES, WE LOVE OUR COUNTRY BUT THAT LOVE MUST BE NURTURED AND KEPT BURNING BY THE KNOWLEDGE THAT WE ARE THE MASTERS OF OUR FATE THROUGH A JURY SYSTEM.

Support our movement for Trial by Jury in the Philippines.  REGISTER NOW.  Your registration is equivalent to signing a Signature Campaign form.

Comments  

 
0 # Edgardo Pichay 2009-11-04 10:39
I love d idea but there's a lot of things to consider like security of d jury n his/her family , is he gonna get paid n be bck frm his present job , wat kind of security N protection d govt can gve after his jury duty etc .
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Edgardo Pichay 2009-11-04 10:55
About Kim's essay I think LOVE is not d main factor but the "EMPTY STOMACH" . Tell me if u can still feel love , think n judge better wid an empty stomach, I think it's poverty , the corrupt rich n grid politicians were taking advantage of d situation.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Daisyabh 2009-11-05 02:25
Yes, an empty stomach could be a hindrance to love for country. But then, you could look at it as an adversity that could prod people to resourcefulness and even to greatness.
But why are we so poor? Is it our poverty that encouraged our politicians and their cronies to exploit the situation for their self-interest? I can see your point in this. Take for example, our squatter problem. The political leaders of the area allow them because they are their voters. Demolishing their squats means they are heartless, so, less votes for them.
However, is it not the corruption in government that caused the poverty in the first place? Think about it. :roll:: :-?:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Daisyabh 2009-11-05 02:49
Jurors are sequestered so that their decision is not influenced by media and outside people. If gangsters are involved, surely something could be done about the security of the jurors. We have the technology. With regards to compensation and the keeping the jurors’ job, they will be paid for their service and they will keep their jobs. Most criminal and civil cases on the average just take only 3 days to a few months, at the most, to resolve not years, unlike in our country.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Geboy Garinggan 2010-01-14 02:21
Jury is certainly right. There are of course lots of other factors to be considered. However, as it is written in the Holy Bible, particularly in 1 Corinthians 13:13,"And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love."

I really believe that love, along with faith and hope, is the word power that can change this nation, Our Philippines.

I pity my nation because many of my fellow Filipinos have no faith. Worse, they lose hope. Worst, they have no love.

I pray that all Filipinos will give a great consideration about this matter.

Let us try to ponder on this passage from the Holy Bible, "if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land." --II Chronicles 7:14.

May Yahweh bless Philippines through His Holy Spirit, in the name of Jesus. Amen
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Daisyabh 2010-02-13 06:59
Thanks Geboy Gariggan for your comment. How about this:
I think there are still many Filipinos who love their country and are willing to sacrifice and offer their time and money for a better Philippines. However, there are also many who have lost hope because fighting for a better Philippines seems to be a lost cause. This is due to apathy or lack of concern from Filipinos who are already satisfied with their lives and are afraid to rock the boat. Many just doubt if the Filipinos are worth fighting for!
With little hope, a bit more love and plenty of faith in the fighting spirit of the young generation to promote a jury system, WE WILL BE ABLE TO REBUILD OUR COUNTRY TO ITS FORMER GLORY AS “ASIA’S SECOND-RICHEST COUNTRY” BEHIND ONLY JAPAN.
:idea:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Geboy G. 2010-02-16 07:29
The Philippines will not only rebuild its former glory as "Asia's second richest country" but will make another and far better name!
Yahweh loves this country!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Rebuilding for the b 2011-04-14 00:33
I agree some of the points but Kim from South Korea have also the point.

Many Filipino step the Philippine Flag just to be renounced and get a new citizenship in Korea. They try to forget the Philippines because of hardship in life wherein the government is making it terrible by stealing money from the coffers

Its true love could changes and we need to love the Philippines. If we love our country then we would forget our self and our own pocket. The Government will stop stealing money from the coffers and the system would be transform.

Read related articles…

http://betterphils.blogspot.com
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Gideon W. 2012-02-13 14:00
In his essay the Korean's observation of us for not loving our country is somewhat valid. I would probably say that we are not that proud of our "Inang Bayan" or our heritage, rather than not loving her.
By observing ourselves, let me point out something very basic.
As migrants, let's compare ourselves to others, especially to those of our ASEAN neighbours. How many migrant Pinoys that you know, would deliberately and wittingly teach their children Tagalog or a regional dialect? Only but a few! And yet, if you visit a family, let's say of Chinese, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin, you notice that parents converse with their children in their own language. Doesn't this say something? Some Pinoy parents told me that out of convenience, they would rather speak English to their children. I kept telling them that there is nothing wrong about their children being bilingual or trilingual. Didn't Rizal said something about not loving your own language? Just a thought.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Daisy Brett-Holt 2012-02-14 02:50
Fr Gideon, thank you for your comment. I suppose it is right to say_ "I love my children but I'm not proud of them or I'm ashamed of them." What can we do besides teaching them our language? I am now forming in and around Frimley an association of Filipino Youth for PJI whose aim is to develop patriotism and love for country. I may need your advice in promoting it. I will keep in touch.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh